| Users |
22,011 |
| Photos |
3,372 |
| Comments |
351 |
| Views |
15,499,593 |
| Disk Space |
345.3mb |
|
| Sun | Mon |
Tue | Wed |
Thu | Fri |
Sat | | | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | | 28 | 29 | 30 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
« Previous image · Next image »
Please help with attribution
Click on image to view larger image
« Previous image · Slide Show · Next image »
Chinacash
Registered: December 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 180
|
The photo shows 2 Northern Song Chong Ning Tong Bao 10 cash coins. The one on the left is Hartill 16.399, I am sure. The coin on the right is, I hope, Hartill 16.401 - large character variety.
The difference in character size is particularly noticeable in the Chong and Bao.
Left hand coin is 34.8mm, 12.4g. Right hand coin 34.7mm, 9.6g
What do you experts think?
|
| · Date: February 3, 2010 · Views: 8,166 · Filesize: 27.0kb, 255.1kb · Dimensions: 886 x 435 ·
|
|
Keywords: Please help with attribution
|
|
|
|
crawforde
Registered: January 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 13
|
|
|
They look more like H16.400 and 16.401 to me. Very nice.
I have another book that has 191 varieties of this coin, it is a nice cheap book available from xiangxiangkafeizha at ebay.
|
|
Moneta
Registered: August 2005
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 2,362
|
|
|
I'm not an expert but I'd have to go with 16.399 & 16.400, sorry. A 16.401 would be really nice (#3!) but is almost a mm smaller according to the rub. All character styles seem to match with 16.400 as well. Very nice examples!
|
|
|
|
